Biodegradable bags can hold a full load of shopping three years after being discarded in the environment, finds study

Biodegradable and compostable plastic bags are still capable of carrying full loads of shopping after being exposed in the natural environment for three years, a study has shown.

Researchers from the University of Plymouth examined the degradation of five plastic bag materials widely available from high street retailers in the UK.

They were then left exposed to air, soil and sea, environment which they could potentially encounter if discarded as litter.

The bags were monitored at regular intervals, and deterioration was considered in terms of visible loss in surface area and disintegration as well as assessments of changes in subtle changes in tensile strength, surface texture, and chemical structure.

After nine months in the open air, the materials had completely disintegrated into fragments.

However, the biodegradable, oxo-biodegradable and conventional plastic formulations remained functional as carrier bags after being in the soil or marine environment for over three years.

The compostable bag completely disappeared from the experimental test rig in the marine environment within three months but, while showing some signs of deterioration, was still present in soil and 27 months.

Researchers from the University’s International Marine Litter Research Unit noted that the study posed a number of questions, the most pertinent is whether biodegradable formulations can be relied upon to offer a sufficiently advanced rate of degradation to offer any realistic solution to the problem of plastic litter.

Imogen Napper, the lead researcher on the study, said: “After three years, I was really amazed that any of the bags could still hold a load of shopping. For a biodegradable bag to be able to do that was the most surprising.”

“When you see something labelled in that way, I think you automatically assume it will degrade more quickly than conventional bags. But, after three years at least, our research shows that might not be the case.”

Professor Richard Thompson OBE, Head of the International Marine Litter Research Unit, said: “This research raises a number of questions about what the public might expect when they see something labelled as biodegradable.”

“We demonstrate here that the materials testing did not present ant consistent, reliable and relevant advantage in the context of marine litter. It concerns me that these novel materials also present challenges in recycling.”

“Our study emphasises the need for standards relating to degradable materials, clearly outlining the appropriate disposal pathway and rates of degradation that can be expected.”